Researchers looking at what limits the efficiency of a promising solar material have revealed the nature of multiple kinds of defects, their varied roles in device efficiency, and their responses to treatment.
Hybrid perovskites are promising materials for the next generation of solar cells as they combine the benefits of both organic and inorganic materials.
Currently, the efficiency of hybrid perovskite solar cells sits between 20% and about 25%. However, the theoretical limits reach about 30%, which is more attractive for use in industry.
Researchers have imaged tiny defect clusters, at the scale of nanometers, that likely form during the fabrication of the perovskites to learn more about what might be impeding efficiency.
They found that there are three kinds of defect clusters and that they differ in terms of their nature and how detrimental they are.
Furthermore, the researchers found that these defects respond differently to common strategies, which implies the need to develop targeted approaches to remove them.
The expansion of solar energy is a necessity to sustainably meet the world’s energy demands. To achieve this, researchers have focused on the development of semiconducting energy materials. One such material, hybrid perovskites, consists of both organic and inorganic ions. These are promising candidates to form the next generation of solar cells, which could be more cost effective and more easily mass produced than the conventional ones currently available.
“If you have a solar cell, you want the whole material to contribute to converting sunlight to electricity, otherwise you are not utilizing its full potential, which is not desirable for commercial purposes,” said Sofiia Kosar, PhD candidate in the OIST Unit and first author of the research paper.
The perovskite material lies at the heart of the solar cell, which consists of many different layers. When the sun hits the solar cell, its energy is absorbed by the perovskite, causing electrons to jump into a higher energy level and leaving holes behind. All the electrons then move in one direction through the layers of the solar cell to the electrical contact. This holes move in the other direction, thus generating a current.
A schematic of a perovskite solar cell, showing that the perovskite is nestled in the center of the cell. Absorption of solar light causes the electrons to jump to higher energy levels, leaving the holes behind. Further separation of the electrons and the holes results in the generation of a current. The existence of defects that might trap the electrons or the holes, can cause the whole solar cell to lose efficiency.
“If there are defects within the material this might impact the generation of electron-hole pairs or their collection at contacts and mean that the perovskite solar cell loses efficiency,” Sofiia said. She went on to explain that, theoretically, perovskite solar cells could convert about 30% of incident light to electricity. “Right now, hybrid perovskites regularly output between 20% and about 25%.”
Experts in the field were aware of the existence of defects that might impede efficiency, but it was previously unclear whether these defects all had the same characteristics and could thus be removed using one strategy. In this study, by using state-of-the-art equipment, the defects were imaged and characterized with a nanoscale resolution to reveal three distinct kinds.
The most detrimental kind the researchers found was the grain boundary defect. These defects are tiny and, as the name suggests, sit at the boundary between different crystal grains of perovskite. They seemed to actively trap photogenerated holes and deplete efficiency from the regions far exceeding their size, thus causing huge issues for the performance of the perovskite.
Then there are polytype defects. These occur when the precursor material crystallizes, not in the typical cubic perovskite structure, but a hexagonal one. This type of defect cluster is relatively big and also negatively impacts efficiency by trapping photogenerated holes.
“If there are a lot of polytype defects in a film, their impact can become just as detrimental as the grain boundary ones,” Sofiia explained. “Both the grain boundary and the polytype defects need to be targeted by developing specific strategies.”
Finally, the study revealed the lead iodide defects. These form from precipitated lead iodide—an important part of perovskite material that is used during the fabrication. However, this research suggests that they are benign in terms of trapping charges and have little impact on efficiency.
The researchers conducted a time-resolved photoemission experiment to understand the role of each defect in perovskite performance. As can be seen in the graph on the right, the grain boundary defects, despite their small size, were the most detrimental for charge carrier trapping, which results in undesirable performance losses for the solar cell.
The researchers decided to use an approach that is often used to reduce defect density in perovskites—treatment with light and oxygen—to see how these defects would respond. They did this by exposing the perovskite to visible light and a mildly oxygenated atmosphere. Interestingly, they found that the defects reacted in different ways. For example, the most detrimental grain boundary defects were healed and stopped trapping the holes. However, the effect on the other defect types was more nuanced and not necessarily beneficial.
“This research shows that we likely need targeted approaches to address the undesired effects of the different defect types, and thus improve the performance of perovskite solar cells,” concluded Prof. Dani.