Publications

(This list includes publications authored by ECSU members [in bold] listing affiliation with OIST)

2024

Peer-reviewed Papers

  1. Froese T., Loh C. L. and Putri F. (2024) Inter-brain desynchronization in social interaction: a consequence of subjective involvement? Front. Hum. Neurosci. 18:1359841. https://doi.org/
  2. Estelle S., Uhlig K, Zapata-Fonseca L., Lerique S., Morrissey B., Sato R, et al. (2024) An open-source perceptual crossing device for investigating brain dynamics during human interaction. PLoS ONE 19(6): e0305283.
  3. Shpurov, I., Froese, T. & Chialvo, D.R. Beehive scale-free emergent dynamics. Sci, Rep 14, 13404 (2024).

Other, Publications

  1. Froese, T., Di, Paolo, E. A., & Ramírez, S. (2024). El enfoque enactivo. Bosquejos teóricos desde la célula hasta la sociedad. Andamios, 21(54).

2023

Peer-reviewed Papers

  1. Sangati, E., Lobo, L., Estelle, S., Sangati, F., Tavassoli, S., & Froese, T. (2023). Uncovering the Role of Intention in Active and Passive, Perception. Proceedings of the Annual, Meeting of the Cognitive, Science Society, 45: 663 - 670
  2. Takada, K., Kumasaki, N., Froese, T., Shibata, K., Nishida, J., & Kasahara, S. (2023). ShadowClones: an Interface to Maintain a Multiple, Sense of Body-space Coordination in Multiple, Visual Perspectives. https://doi.org/ 
  3. Froese, T., Weber, N., Shpurov, I., & Ikegami, T. (2023). From autopoiesis to self-optimization: Toward an enactive model of biological regulation. Biosystems, 230, 104959. DOI: 
  4. Hermans, K., Kirtley, O., Kasanova, Z., Achterhof, R., Hagemann, N., Hiekkaranta, A. P., Lecei, A., Zapata-Fonseca, L., Lafit, G., Fossion, R., Froese, T. & Myin‐Germeys, I. ((in press)). Ecological and convergent validity of experimentally and dynamically assessed social capacity using the Perceptual, Crossing Experiment in adolescence. Assessment. https://doi.org/ 
  5. James, M. M. ((forthcoming)). Enacting, Ontological Design: A Vocabulary of Change from Organisms to Organizations. In R. Gahrn-Anderson, S. J. Cowley, and D. Secchi (Eds.), Organizational, Cognition: The, Theory of Social, Organizing (pp. 259-280). Routledge. 
  6. Munson, J. L., Scholnick, J., Mejía Ramón, A. G., & Paiz, Aragón, L. ((in press)). Beyond, House Size: Alternative, Estimates of Wealth, Inequality in the Ancient, Maya Lowlands. Ancient, Mesoamerica. https://doi.org/ 
  7. Weber, N., Koch, W., & Froese T. (2023). Scaling up the self-optimization model by means of on-the-fly computation of weights. In 2022 IEEE Symposium, Series on Computational, Intelligence (SSCI), pp. 1276-1282. https://doi.org/ 
  8. Froese, T. (2023). Irruption, Theory: A Novel, Conceptualization of the Enactive, Account of Motivated, Activity. Entropy 25(5): 748 https://doi.org/ 
  9. Sheets, P. D., & Mejía Ramón, A. G. ((in press)). Following the Silencio, Processional Path, Eastward. Vínculos: Revista de Antropología del Museo, Nacional de Costa, Rica.
  10. Froese, R., Coro, G., Palomares, M. L. D., Bailly, N., Scotti, M., Froese, T., Garilao, C., & Pauly, D. (2023). A simple framework for the exploration of functional biodiversity. Cybium, 47(3): 271-286. https://doi.org/ 
  11. James M. M.  & Leader J. F. (2023) Do digital hugs work? Re-embodying our social lives online with digital tact. Fronteirs in Psychology 14:910174. https://doi.org/

Other, Publications

  1. Froese, T., & Gallaga, E. ((in press)). Measuring entanglement in material traces of ritualized interaction: Preferential attachment in a prehistoric petroglyph distribution. Handbook of Material, Religion. Routledge. https://doi.org/ 
  2. Froese, T. ((forthcoming)). What is ‘the Secret of Life’? The, Mind-Body, Problem in Čapek’s Rossum's Universal, Robots (R.U.R.). In J. Čejková (Ed.), Karel Čapek's R.U.R. and the Vision of Artificial, Life. MIT Press. []
  3. Mejía Ramón, A. G. (2023). La, Transición Neolítica en el Sur de Centramérica. 
    SocArXiv. https://doi.org/ 
  4. Froese, T., & Sykes, J. (2023). La pragmatique, l’inscription corporelle, et l’efficacité de l’expérience vécue: évaluer les principes fondamentaux de la neurophénoménologie Varélienne. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/ 
  5. Mejía Ramón, A. G. (2023). Efficient, Functions for Energetic, Least-Cost, Analysis over Land and Water in the lbmech package for R. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/ 

2022

Peer-reviewed Papers

  1. Lerique, S. (2022). Embodied rationality through game theoretic glasses: an empirical point of contact. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 815691. https://doi.org/ 
  2. Hermans, K. S., Kirtley, O. J., Kasanova, Z., Achterhof, R., Hagemann, N., Hiekkaranta, A. P., Lecei, A., Zapata-Fonseca, L., Lafit, G., Fossion, R., Froese, T. & Myin‐Germeys, I. (2022). Capacity for social contingency detection continues to develop across adolescence. Social, Development, 31, 530– 548. https://doi.org/ 
  3. Froese, T. (2022). Scientific observation is socio-materially augmented perception: Toward a participatory realism. Philosophies, 7(2), Article 37. https://doi.org/
  4. Pescador, Canales, C., & Mojica, L. (2022). Making us Autonomous: The, Enactive Normativity of Morality. Topoi, 41, 257–274. https://doi.org/ 
  5. Mejía Ramón, A. G., & Froese, T. (2022). Un, Monumento Teotihuacano al Dios de las Tormentas con Tocado del Signo del Año en el Santuario de Tlaloc. Mexicon 44(5): 135-140. https://doi.org/ 
  6. James M. M., Rodrigues J., Montoya M., Koshkina N., Sangati F., Sangati E., Ratcliffe M., Carel H. and Froese T. (2022) The, Pandemic Experience, Survey II: A Second, Corpus of Subject, Reports of Life, Under Social, Restrictions During COVID-19 in the UK, Japan, and Mexico. Frontiers in Public, Health, 10, 913096. https://doi.org/ 
  7. Shimizu K. , Ienaga N. , Takada, K., Sugimoto M., Kasahara S. (2022). Human, Latent Metrics: Perceptual and Cognitive, Response Correlates to Distance in GAN Latent, Space for Facial, Images. In M. Lau,  A. Robb, M. Barnett-Cowan, A. Serrano, S. Malpica (Eds.), ACM Symposium on Applied, Perception, Article 3 (pp. 1-10). Association for Computing, Machinery. https://doi.org/ 
  8. Shpurov, I., & Froese, T. (2022). Evidence of Critical, Dynamics in Movements of Bees inside a Hive. Entropy 24(12): 1840. https://doi.org/ 

Other, Publications

  1. Keshmiri, S., Sangati, F. & Sangati, E. (2022). Information, Integration in Division of Labor: Validation of Earlier, Findings. In, Proceedings of the Joint, Symposium of AROB-ISBC-SWARM 2022 (pp. 24-29). International, Society of Artificial, Life and Robotics.
  2. Loh, C. L. & Froese, T. (2022). Prospects of inter-brain synchronization with a virtual agent: Preliminary considerations. In, Proceedings of the Joint, Symposium of AROB-ISBC-SWARM 2022 (pp. 237-242). International, Society of Artificial, Life and Robotics.  
  3. Ramírez-Vizcaya, S. (2022). A world-involving theory of agency: review of Sensorimotor, Life: An, Enactive Proposal by Ezequiel, Di Paolo, Thomas, Buhrmann, and Xabier, Barandiaran. Oxford, University Press, Oxford, 2017. Adaptive, Behavior, 30(2), 205-208. https://doi.org/ 
  4. Mojica, L. (2022). Material playgrounds: opening an ontology of active matter. Adaptive, Behavior, 30(6), 535-536. https://doi.org/ 
  5. Froese, T., & Froese, R. (2022). The thermodynamics of reproduction constrain species ranking dynamics and diversity. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/ 
  6. Froese, T. (2022). Irruption, Theory: A Realist, Framework for the Efficacy of Conscious, Agency. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/ 
  7. Froese, T. (2021). To understand the origin of life we must first understand the role of normativity. Biosemiotics, 14, 657-663. https://doi.org/ 
  8. Sangati, E. (2022) Turning language-science prospects into science. Constructivist, Foundations, 18(1), 049-051. []
  9. Takada, K., & Watanabe, K. (2022). Exploring the Mechanism of Self-Attribution, Occurrence using Multiple, Dummy Cursors. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/ 

2021

Peer-reviewed Papers

  1. Sangati, E., Slors, M., Müller, B. C., & van Rooij, I. (2021). Joint, Simon effect in movement trajectories. PLoS ONE, 16(12), Article e0261735. https://doi.org/ 
  2. Mojica, L. (2021). The enactive naturalization of normativity: from self-maintenance to situated interactions. History and Philosophy of the Life, Sciences, 43(127). https://doi.org/ 
  3. Reséndiz-Benhumea, G. M., Sangati, E., Sangati, F., Keshmiri, S., & Froese, T. (2021). Shrunken social brains? a minimal model of the role of social interaction in neural complexity. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 15, 634085. https://doi.org/ 
  4. Mojica, L., & Gastelum, Vargas, M. (2021). The affective and normative intentionality of skilled performance: a radical embodied approach. Synthese, 199(3), 8205-8230. https://doi.org/ 
  5. Froese, T., Broome, M., Carel, H., Humpston, C., Malpass, A., Mori, T., Ratcliffe, M., Rodrigues, J. & Sangati, F. (2021). The, Pandemic Experience: A corpus of subjective reports on life during the first wave of COVID-19 in the UK, Japan, and Mexico. Frontiers in Public, Health, 9, 725506. https://doi.org/ 
  6. Loh, C. L., & Froese, T. (2021). An, Oscillator Model for Interbrain, Synchrony: Slow, Interactional Rhythms, Entrain Fast, Neural Activity. In 2021 IEEE Conference on Computational, Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational, Biology (CIBCB) (pp. 1-8). IEEE Press. https://doi.org/ 
  7. Shpurov, I., & Froese, T. (2021). Combining, Self-critical dynamics and Hebbian learning to explain utility of bursty dynamics in neural networks. In 2021 IEEE Symposium, Series on Computational, Intelligence (SSCI) (pp. 1-6). IEEE Press. https://doi.org/ 
  8. Sangati, E., Keshmiri, S., & Sangati, F. (2021). Evolution of Neural, Complexity in Division of Labor, Tasks. In ALIFE 2021: The 2021 Conference on Artificial, Life (pp. 88). MIT Press. https://doi.org/ 
  9. Baranski, A., & Froese, T. (2021). Efficient, Spike Timing, Dependent Plasticity rule for Complex-Valued, Neurons. In ALIFE 2021: The 2021 Conference on Artificial, Life (pp. 76). MIT Press. https://doi.org/ 

Other, Publications

  1. Froese, T. (2021). Epilogue to “Questioning, Life and Cognition” by John, Stewart. Adaptive, Behavior, 29(5), 523-527. https://doi.org/
  2. Froese, T. (2021). Temporality and affectivity in depression and schizophrenia: Commentary on Lenzo and Gallagher. In C. Tewes and G. Stanghellini (Eds.), Time and Body: Phenomenological and Psychopathological, Approaches. Cambridge, University Press, 311-317.  https://doi.org/ 
  3. Froese, T., & Krueger, J. (2021). Lost in the socially extended mind: Genuine intersubjectivity and disturbed self-other demarcation in schizophrenia. In C. Tewes and G. Stanghellini (Eds.), Time and Body: Phenomenological and Psychopathological, Approaches. Cambridge, University Press, 318-340. 
  4. Bennett, D., Dix, A., Eslambolchilar, P., Feng, F., Froese, T., Kostakos, V., Lerique, S. and van Berkel, N. (2021). Emergent interaction: complexity, dynamics, and enaction in HC. I. In Y. Kitamura, and A. Quigley (Eds.), Extended, Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human, Factors in Computing, Systems (pp. 1-7). Association for Computing, Machinery. https://doi.org/

2020

Peer-reviewed Papers

  1. ​Dudysová, D., Janků, K., Šmotek, M., Saifutdinova, E., Kopřivová, J., Bušková, J., Mander, B., Brunovský, M., Zach, P., Korčák, J., Andrashko, V., Viktorinová, M., Tylš, F., Bravermanová, A., Froese, T., Páleníček, T., and Horáček, J. (2020). The effects of daytime psilocybin administration on sleep: implications for antidepressant action. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 11. https://doi.org/ 
  2. Froese, T., Zapata-Fonseca, L., Leenen, I., & Fossion, R. (2020). The feeling is mutual: clarity of haptics-mediated social perception is not associated with the recognition of the other, only with recognition of each other. Frontiers in Human, Neuroscience, 14, 560567. https://doi.org/ 
  3. Valencia, A. L., & Froese, T. (2020). What binds us? Inter-brain neural synchronization and its implications for theories of human consciousness. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2020(1). https://doi.org/ 
  4. Travieso, D., Lobo, L., De, Paz, C., Langelaar, T. E., Ibáñez-Gijón, J., & Jacobs, D. M. (2020). Dynamic touch as common ground for enactivism and ecological psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1257. https://doi.org/ 
  5. Froese, T., & Ortiz-Garin, G. U. (2020). Where, Is the Action in Perception? An, Exploratory Study, With a Haptic, Sensory Substitution, Device. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 809. https://doi.org/ 
  6. Heras-Escribano, M. (2020). The evolutionary role of affordances: ecological psychology, niche construction, and natural selection. Biology & Philosophy, 35(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/ 
  7. Hermans, K. S., Kasanova, Z., Zapata-Fonseca, L., Lafit, G., Fossion, R., Froese, T., & Myin-Germeys, I. (2020). Investigating real-time social interaction in pairs of adolescents with the Perceptual, Crossing Experiment. Behavior, Research Methods, 52, 1929-1938. https://doi.org/ 
  8. Morales, A., & Froese, T. (2020). Unsupervised learning facilitates neural coordination across the functional clusters of the C. elegans connectome. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, 40. https://doi.org/
  9. Reséndiz-Benhumea, G. M., Sangati, E., & Froese, T. (2020). Levels of coupling in dyadic interaction: An analysis of neural and behavioral complexity. In 2020 IEEE Symposium, Series on Computational, Intelligence (SSCI) (pp. 2250-2256). IEEE Press. https://doi.org/ 
  10. Morales, A., & Froese, T. (2020). The distribution of inhibitory neurons in the C. elegans connectome facilitates self-optimization of coordinated neural activity. In 2020 IEEE Symposium, Series on Computational, Intelligence (SSCI) (pp. 1195-1201). IEEE Press. https://doi.org/ 
  11. Sangati, E., & Hofmann, S. M. (2020). The role of Co-Representations in joint tracking. In ALIFE 2020: The 2020 Conference on Artificial, Life (pp. 526-534). MIT Press. https://doi.org/ 
  12. Dotov, D., & Froese, T. (2020). Dynamic interactive artificial intelligence: Sketches for a future AI based on human-machine interaction. In ALIFE 2020: The 2020 Conference on Artificial, Life (pp. 139-145). MIT Press. https://doi.org/
  13. Ramírez-Vizcaya, S., & Froese, T. (2020). Agents of Habit: Refining the Artificial, Life Route to Artificial, Intelligence. In ALIFE 2020: The 2020 Conference on Artificial, Life (pp. 78-86). MIT Press. https://doi.org/ 

Other, Publications

  1. Heras-Escribano, M. (2020). Author’s response: Affordances as a basis for a post-cognitivist approach to the mind. Constructivist, Foundations, 15(3), 231-237. 
  2. Mojica, L. (2020). Reclaiming meaning, reclaiming normativity. Constructivist foundations, 15(3), 216-218. []
  3. Mojica, L. (2019). Mentes en cuerpos de afecto: nota crítica sobre Ecology of the Brain, de Thomas, Fuchs. Crítica (México, DF), 51(153), 83-97. https://doi.org/ 
  4. Heras-Escribano, M. (2020). Précis of the philosophy of affordances. Constructivist, Foundations, 15(3), 199-213. []
  5. Carel, H., Ratcliffe, M., & Froese, T. (2020). Reflecting on experiences of social distancing. The, Lancet, 396(10244), 87-88. https://doi.org/ 
  6. Reséndiz-Benhumea, G. M., & Froese, T. (2020). Enhanced neural complexity is achieved by mutually coordinated embodied social interaction: A statespace analysis. In, The Second, International Workshop on Agent-Based, Modelling of Human, Behaviour (2020 ABMHuB Workshop).